Thursday, December 9, 2004

We now interrupt this wedded bliss for some blog reviews

by Chalicechick

Adventures in Small Group Ministry
Peter writes about blurring the distinction between lay and ordained ministry. I’m of two minds. I’ve met a UU minister or two whose insights could easily be bested by the average layman. Those people use their status as the minister to peddle really mediocre ideas. Hate that. That having been said, I’ve been to a whole lot of lay services that basically boiled down to talks on gardening or politics or the logistics of running a church. Those aren’t sermons, kids, and even the worst trained minister grasps that.

The Boy in the Bands
Scott Wells mentions that Ikeas sometimes have cafeterias that have really good meatballs (though he fails to mention that they have really good salmon, too) and segues into talking about the Swedenborgians, who sound like they fit somewhere between Mormons and folks into eckankar on the scale of people who believe weird things. It’s worth a look.

Call and Response
Has an advent service about the preparations for Chrismahanukwanzakah. I find the idea of us basing our services on a holiday invented by Virgin Mobile that combines the most shallow aspects of two religious holidays and a cultural one rather depressing, but no service that includes Lawrence Ferlinghetti poetry can be all bad, and they did seem to do reasonable things with parts of it. Still, ick, y’all.

Facilitating Paradox
Links to a really excellent article about Ned Flanders as a symbol for society’s view of evangelical Christians

I Am a Druid
Morgan writes about a druid Episcopal priest who has had to renounce his druid-hood to keep his job. It would be interesting to hear more about the facts of this one.

Presbyopic Myopia
Has a really thoughtful interesting take on American culture and why we haven’t gotten Bin Laden. Good stuff.

CC

Posted by Chalicechick, December 9, 2004 11:49 AM
Comments:

Revsparker says:

December 10, 2004 09:16 AM | Permalink for this comment

CC--
Your links appear to be broken...

Revsparker

Julia says:

December 10, 2004 04:09 PM | Permalink for this comment

yep, but you can figure out what they are from the path error, if you are a bored geek. Hallooo?

Philocrites says:

December 10, 2004 04:38 PM | Permalink for this comment

All links have been updated and fixed. (He says, editorially.)

ChaliceChick says:

December 10, 2004 08:16 PM | Permalink for this comment

Wow. Nice to know I'm read.

Thanks for fixing the links, Chris.

CC

Mark Brooks says:

December 10, 2004 10:42 PM | Permalink for this comment

Wow, indeed! It's nice to know that even ONE person read what I wrote! Praise God and pass the keystrokes!

Dhiro says:

December 10, 2004 11:37 PM | Permalink for this comment

I ditto what Mark Brooks said. I really haven't had the time to maintain posting as I once had. It's nice to know some actual humans read the few things I do post. Thanks.

Philocrites says:

December 11, 2004 10:41 AM | Permalink for this comment

We're gonna turn this Interdependent Web into one thriving buzzing hive of Internet activity if it takes all the fair-trade coffee beans in the world! Fear not, bloggers: Chalicechick and I (and undoubtedly many lurkers, too) love you! We read you! Keep blogging!

And wouldn't it be fun to come up with a round of first annual UU Blogging Awards? We could come up with categories and then set up real nominations. Thoughts?

Post a comment:









Remember personal info?


You must enter both a name and a valid e-mail address to leave a comment on this site. If you have your own blog or Web site, you may also enter its "URL," beginning with http://